Independent civic archive2026-10-22 / Edition 0.24

BC-029 / Public-records correspondence

Researchers identify limits in their short-term rental data

19 May 2024 · Source page checked

Pittenger raises missing resolution and STR-identification fields; Schwaab agrees the data is unsuitable for that analysis.

People named in this record: Natalie Pittenger, Eric Schwaab

PRR #2025-0472, Package 12, PDF page 72 / printed 1039

Read the record

In the May 19 exchange, Pittenger says the merged material does not reliably identify STRs or explain complaint resolution. Schwaab agrees that the data is unsuitable for an STR analysis. These are the researchers’ own assessments; the wider workbook is preserved as context rather than treated as verified incident counts.

What it establishes

Explicit internal caution that should qualify downstream claims drawn from dataset.

Limits and context

The concession concerns this use of the dataset; it does not invalidate all possible uses. Complaint narratives are allegations, duplicates are not independent events, and the workbook has not been independently audited.

Source location

Checked passages: PRR #2025-0472, Package 12, PDF page 72 / printed 1039.

Sources

Review scope

Key statements and the listed source pages were visually checked. Additional chain context was read through OCR and remains subject to source-image verification.

Editorial review: 2026-10-19. Event dates above describe the records, not this page’s publication date.

Full annotated archive entry · Question or correction

Correction history