Independent civic archive2026-10-22 / Edition 0.24

BC-025 / Public-records correspondence

Clark advises Pittenger on seeking appointment support

1 November 2024 · Source page checked

Clark suggests reaching out for Council support, explains the seven-vote requirement and raises possible suspension of rules.

People named in this record: Kris Clark, Natalie Pittenger

PRR #2025-0472, Package 10, PDF page 63 / printed 860

Read the record

In the checked November 1 reply, Clark names Councilors who supported Pittenger at Appointments, says seven votes are needed, and suggests contacting additional Councilors. She discusses first and second readings and possible rules suspension, citing ZBA understaffing and encouraging meeting attendance.

What it establishes

Direct appointment-process guidance and expressed support from committee/council member.

Limits and context

No completed seven-vote coalition, rules suspension or final appointment is proved by this exchange. Later appointment status must not be inferred from the advice alone. August 2025 is the FOIA-forward date.

Source location

Checked passages: PRR #2025-0472, Package 10, PDF page 63 / printed 860.

Sources

Review scope

Key statements and the listed source pages were visually checked. Additional chain context was read through OCR and remains subject to source-image verification.

Editorial review: 2026-10-19. Event dates above describe the records, not this page’s publication date.

Full annotated archive entry · Question or correction