BC-014 / Public-records correspondence
Bloom reports seeking a pause; Tamash explains a procedural limit
Bloom reports asking for a pause and explanation, while Tamash’s earlier reply points Schwaab toward appeals.
People named in this record: Charles Bloom, Craig Tamash, Eric Schwaab
Read the record
Bloom’s June 3 email says he asked that procedures stop and that officials explain their response to Cambareri’s letter before appeal became necessary. He also says he has not heard back. On June 2, Tamash relays Town legal advice that the closed hearing cannot reopen and identifies court and DEP appeal routes. Schwaab asks him to arrange three minutes for abutters.
What it establishes
Official assistance request plus Councilor attempted intervention and contrary procedural guidance.
Limits and context
The correspondence does not prove Bloom controlled or delayed Conservation action. Tamash is relaying legal advice, not an independently verified ruling. Schwaab’s online criticism does not establish the truth of his allegations.
Source location
Checked passages: PRR #2025-0472, Package 5, PDF page 13 / printed 341; PRR #2025-0472, Package 5, PDF page 29 / printed 357.
Sources
- Read source page TBR-0472-05-0013 and surrounding context Visually checked primary page
- Read source page TBR-0472-05-0029 and surrounding context Visually checked primary page
Review scope
Key statements and the listed source pages were visually checked. Additional chain context was read through OCR and remains subject to source-image verification.
Editorial review: 2026-10-19. Event dates above describe the records, not this page’s publication date.